You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Government
auditor. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11
methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance
appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
1. Employee Details
• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager
2. Work performance of Government auditor
How to identify work
performance of Government auditor?
• Setting up KRA, duties,
responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of
each KRA/duty/responsibility.
Using the 4-point scale below,
please assess your employee performance in the following areas:
• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable
and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard
with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet
standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to
expectations and the requirements of the position.
Then, you can create a table
with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.
3. Job objectives of Government auditor
List the objectives you set
out for your staff (Government auditor) to achieve in the past 12 months (or
the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed –
against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where
appropriate.
Score the performance against
each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):
Then you create a table with
columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment
4. Job competencies
Discuss and agree the skills,
capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if
appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.
Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:
• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4
5. Career development of Government auditor
Discuss and agree (as far as
is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations)
the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the
agreed objectives above.
6. Overall rating of Government auditor:
• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position
Other comments:
7. Signatures
Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date
Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature
Government auditor’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date
Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to
line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.
Please note that, forms of performance
appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree
form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…
No comments:
Post a Comment